Neuromyth prevalence in teachers at the University of Cienfuegos

The premature application of neuroscientific knowledge generates erroneous beliefs or neuromyths in professors. Hence the execution of a descriptive study aimed at identifying the prevalence of neuromyths in 40 university professors from the Faculty of Education Sciences of the University of Cienfue...

Ful tanımlama

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yazar: Jiménez Pérez, Elena Hatty (author)
Diğer Yazarlar: Calzadilla-Pérez, Oscar Ovidio (author)
Materyal Türü: article
Dil:İspanyolca
İngilizce
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2021
Konular:
Online Erişim:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/2358
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5534
Etiketler: Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
Diğer Bilgiler
Özet:The premature application of neuroscientific knowledge generates erroneous beliefs or neuromyths in professors. Hence the execution of a descriptive study aimed at identifying the prevalence of neuromyths in 40 university professors from the Faculty of Education Sciences of the University of Cienfuegos (Cuba) and the predictors that may influence false beliefs about the brain. For this purpose, a questionnaire designed to evaluate neuromyths and predictors was contextualized. An analysis of the variables was executed: 1) participants’ characteristics, 2) neuromyths, and 3) predictors; for which linear regression was applied. The evaluation of the study hypothesis was carried out through the non-parametric Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Tests. The most significant result was the identification of predictors on the predominance of neuromyths in professors for their subsequent treatment in initial and continuous training.