Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad
The comparative analysis focuses on investigating the discrepancies between the E.030 regulations of 2003 and 2018 in relation to anti-seismic design. This study is carried out in the context of structural wall structures intended for an Educational Center located in the city of La Libertad. Several...
Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Andre forfattere: | , |
| Format: | article |
| Sprog: | spansk |
| Udgivet: |
2024
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419 |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
| _version_ | 1868890200055218176 |
|---|---|
| author | Rupay Vargas, Marcos Josué |
| author2 | Parra Lavado, Regner Raúl López Yarango, Jorge Santiago |
| author2_role | author author |
| author_browse | López Yarango, Jorge Santiago Parra Lavado, Regner Raúl Rupay Vargas, Marcos Josué |
| author_facet | Rupay Vargas, Marcos Josué Parra Lavado, Regner Raúl López Yarango, Jorge Santiago |
| author_role | author |
| collection | REDUM |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Rupay Vargas, Marcos Josué Parra Lavado, Regner Raúl López Yarango, Jorge Santiago |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-12-13 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf text/html |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419 10.36561/ING.27.8 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad de Montevideo |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419/1802 http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419/1803 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería; No. 27 (2024); 110-128 Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería; Núm. 27 (2024); 110-128 Memoria Investigaciones en Ingenieria; n. 27 (2024); 110-128 2301-1106 2301-1092 10.36561/ING.27 reponame:REDUM instname:Universidad de Montevideo instacron:Universidad de Montevideo |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Diseño sismorresistente Análisis dinámico Periodos de vibración Espectro de diseño Seismic-resistant design Dynamic analysis Vibration periods Design spectrum Design resistente a sismos Análise dinâmica Períodos de vibração Espectro de design |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad Diseño sismorresistente de un sistema de muros estructurales aplicando la Norma E.030 del 2003 y 2018 en la ciudad de La Libertad Projeto Resistente a Terremotos de um Sistema Estrutural de Parede aplicando a Norma E.030 de 2003 e 2018 na Cidade de La Libertad |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed articles Artículos evaluados por pares Artigos revistos por pares publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | The comparative analysis focuses on investigating the discrepancies between the E.030 regulations of 2003 and 2018 in relation to anti-seismic design. This study is carried out in the context of structural wall structures intended for an Educational Center located in the city of La Libertad. Several important aspects are contrasted, such as vibration periods, percentage of participating mass, design spectrum, deformation and various forces, such as static and dynamic basal shear force, in addition to maximum design forces, such as moment bending, shear and axial force.Using the Etabs v.20 software to model the structures, significant variations in the results were observed when applying the standards according to the year 2003 and 2018. It is relevant to note that the 2018 regulations produce intermediate results in terms of modal periods for both. structures, both in static and dynamic analysis. In summary, it is shown that changes in regulations have a notable influence on the design and seismic response of structures, especially those with irregularities, and it is essential to take these aspects into account when carrying out structural analysis and design. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | anni_d22c343d92aea653243ceffc1caa3edc |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.36561/ING.27.8 |
| instacron_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
| institution | Universidad de Montevideo |
| instname_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | anni |
| network_name_str | oai-lr-anni |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/2679 |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad de Montevideo |
| reponame_str | REDUM |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
| spelling | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La LibertadDiseño sismorresistente de un sistema de muros estructurales aplicando la Norma E.030 del 2003 y 2018 en la ciudad de La LibertadProjeto Resistente a Terremotos de um Sistema Estrutural de Parede aplicando a Norma E.030 de 2003 e 2018 na Cidade de La LibertadRupay Vargas, Marcos JosuéParra Lavado, Regner RaúlLópez Yarango, Jorge SantiagoDiseño sismorresistenteAnálisis dinámicoPeriodos de vibraciónEspectro de diseñoSeismic-resistant designDynamic analysisVibration periodsDesign spectrumDesign resistente a sismosAnálise dinâmicaPeríodos de vibraçãoEspectro de designThe comparative analysis focuses on investigating the discrepancies between the E.030 regulations of 2003 and 2018 in relation to anti-seismic design. This study is carried out in the context of structural wall structures intended for an Educational Center located in the city of La Libertad. Several important aspects are contrasted, such as vibration periods, percentage of participating mass, design spectrum, deformation and various forces, such as static and dynamic basal shear force, in addition to maximum design forces, such as moment bending, shear and axial force.Using the Etabs v.20 software to model the structures, significant variations in the results were observed when applying the standards according to the year 2003 and 2018. It is relevant to note that the 2018 regulations produce intermediate results in terms of modal periods for both. structures, both in static and dynamic analysis. In summary, it is shown that changes in regulations have a notable influence on the design and seismic response of structures, especially those with irregularities, and it is essential to take these aspects into account when carrying out structural analysis and design.El análisis comparativo se centra en investigar las discrepancias entre las normativas E.030 de 2003 y 2018 en relación con el diseño antisísmico. Este estudio se realiza en el contexto de estructuras de muros estructurales destinadas para un Centro Educativo ubicado en la ciudad de La Libertad. Se contrastan varios aspectos importantes, como los períodos de vibración, el porcentaje de masa participativa, el espectro de diseño, la deformación y diversas fuerzas, tales como la fuerza cortante basal estática y dinámica, además de las fuerzas máximas de diseño, como el momento flector, el cortante y la fuerza axial.Utilizando el software Etabs v.20 para modelar las estructuras, se observaron variaciones significativas en los resultados al aplicar las normas según el año del 2003 y 2018. Es relevante señalar que la normativa de 2018 produce resultados intermedios en cuanto a los períodos modales para ambas estructuras, tanto en el análisis estático como en el dinámico. En síntesis, se demuestra que las modificaciones en la normativa tienen una influencia notable en el diseño y la respuesta sísmica de las estructuras, especialmente en aquellas con irregularidades, y es fundamental tener en cuenta estos aspectos al llevar a cabo análisis y diseño estructural.A análise comparativa centra-se na investigação das discrepâncias entre os regulamentos E.030 de 2003 e 2018 em relação ao design anti-sísmico. Este estudo é realizado no contexto de estruturas estruturais de parede destinadas a um Centro Educacional localizado na cidade de La Libertad. Vários aspectos importantes são contrastados, como períodos de vibração, porcentagem de massa participante, espectro de projeto, deformação e forças diversas, como força cortante basal estática e dinâmica, além de forças máximas de projeto, como momento fletor, cisalhante e força axial.Utilizando o software Etabs v.20 para modelar as estruturas, foram observadas variações significativas nos resultados ao aplicar as normas de acordo com o ano de 2003 e 2018. É relevante notar que a regulamentação de 2018 produz resultados intermediários em termos de períodos modais para ambos. estruturas, tanto em análise estática como dinâmica. Em resumo, mostra-se que as alterações na regulamentação têm uma influência notável no dimensionamento e na resposta sísmica das estruturas, especialmente aquelas com irregularidades, sendo essencial ter estes aspectos em consideração na realização da análise e dimensionamento estrutural.Universidad de Montevideo2024-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewed articlesArtículos evaluados por paresArtigos revistos por parespublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/141910.36561/ING.27.8Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería; No. 27 (2024); 110-128Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería; Núm. 27 (2024); 110-128Memoria Investigaciones en Ingenieria; n. 27 (2024); 110-1282301-11062301-109210.36561/ING.27reponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de Montevideospahttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419/1802http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419/1803http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución 4.0 Internacionaloai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/26792026-06-16T07:04:38Z |
| spellingShingle | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad Rupay Vargas, Marcos Josué Diseño sismorresistente Análisis dinámico Periodos de vibración Espectro de diseño Seismic-resistant design Dynamic analysis Vibration periods Design spectrum Design resistente a sismos Análise dinâmica Períodos de vibração Espectro de design |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad |
| title_full | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad |
| title_fullStr | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad |
| title_full_unstemmed | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad |
| title_short | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad |
| title_sort | Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad |
| topic | Diseño sismorresistente Análisis dinámico Periodos de vibración Espectro de diseño Seismic-resistant design Dynamic analysis Vibration periods Design spectrum Design resistente a sismos Análise dinâmica Períodos de vibração Espectro de design |
| url | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/1419 |