Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary

The availability of large textual datasets enables automated analysis of psychological constructs. To facilitate this, programs have been developed to categorize words and identify various aspects such as cognitive styles, linguistic features, and emotional content. This study consists of two parts...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna (author)
Other Authors: Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe (author), Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo (author), Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila (author)
Format: article
Language:Spanish
English
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868890205444898816
author Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
author2 Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
author2_role author
author
author
author_browse Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
author_facet Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
author_role author
collection LIBERI
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
Medina-Arboleda, Iván Felipe
Aguilar-Pardo, David Ricardo
Garzón-Velandia, Diana Camila
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-09-16
2025-12-22T16:34:58Z
2025-12-22T16:34:58Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356
10.22235/cp.v19i2.4356
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3906
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3907
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3908
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Ciencias Psicológicas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356
Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356
Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356
1688-4221
10.22235/cp.v19i2
reponame:LIBERI
instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
LIWC
cooperación
jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
LIWC
cooperação
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
Desarrollo, validación y evidencias experimentales de un diccionario de prosocialidad
Desenvolvimento, validação e evidências experimentais de um dicionário de pró-socialidade
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description The availability of large textual datasets enables automated analysis of psychological constructs. To facilitate this, programs have been developed to categorize words and identify various aspects such as cognitive styles, linguistic features, and emotional content. This study consists of two parts that provide evidence of content and external validity for a dictionary designed to assess prosociality, which is compatible with LIWC software. Study 1 is based on a corpus of terms drawn from both natural and specialized sources, evaluated by seven judges, resulting in a definitive list. In Study 2, a public goods game was conducted in which 160 participants faced a dilemma between self-interest and collective well-being. Participants also described the strategies they used in the game and the emotions they experienced. These written responses were analyzed using the dictionary developed in Study 1. The results showed that prosociality, as measured by the dictionary, was positively associated with cooperative behavior in the game. Additionally, cognitive style II was found to predict prosocial behavior. Together, these studies demonstrate the dictionary's utility in evaluating prosociality through linguistic analysis and its potential for estimating this construct in various contexts.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id anni_d81e53c8e5ca2feec6befa1a5cd4076f
identifier_str_mv 10.22235/cp.v19i2.4356
instacron_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
institution Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instname_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
language spa
eng
network_acronym_str anni
network_name_str oai-lr-anni
oai_identifier_str oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/5696
publishDate 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
reponame_str LIBERI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Ciencias Psicológicas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spelling Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionaryDesarrollo, validación y evidencias experimentales de un diccionario de prosocialidadDesenvolvimento, validação e evidências experimentais de um dicionário de pró-socialidadeRojas Landinez, Leidy JohannaMedina-Arboleda, Iván FelipeAguilar-Pardo, David RicardoGarzón-Velandia, Diana Camilapublic goods gamelanguage analysisLIWCcooperationjuego de bienes públicosanálisis lingüísticoLIWCcooperaciónjogo de bens públicosanálise linguísticaLIWCcooperaçãoThe availability of large textual datasets enables automated analysis of psychological constructs. To facilitate this, programs have been developed to categorize words and identify various aspects such as cognitive styles, linguistic features, and emotional content. This study consists of two parts that provide evidence of content and external validity for a dictionary designed to assess prosociality, which is compatible with LIWC software. Study 1 is based on a corpus of terms drawn from both natural and specialized sources, evaluated by seven judges, resulting in a definitive list. In Study 2, a public goods game was conducted in which 160 participants faced a dilemma between self-interest and collective well-being. Participants also described the strategies they used in the game and the emotions they experienced. These written responses were analyzed using the dictionary developed in Study 1. The results showed that prosociality, as measured by the dictionary, was positively associated with cooperative behavior in the game. Additionally, cognitive style II was found to predict prosocial behavior. Together, these studies demonstrate the dictionary's utility in evaluating prosociality through linguistic analysis and its potential for estimating this construct in various contexts.La presencia de grandes datos textuales permite el análisis automatizado de constructos psicológicos. Para ello, se han desarrollado programas que categorizan palabras e identifican, entre otros, estilos cognitivos, lingüísticos o contenido emocional. Este trabajo consta de dos estudios que presentan evidencia de validez de contenido y externa de un diccionario para estimar la prosocialidad, compatible con el software LIWC. El Estudio 1 parte de un corpus de términos construido con base en fuentes naturales y especializadas, que fue evaluado por siete jueces, lo que dio paso a la conformación de una lista definitiva. En el Estudio 2 se utilizó un juego de bienes públicos, en el que 160 participantes eligieron en un dilema económico interés propio versus bienestar colectivo. Adicionalmente, los participantes respondieron por escrito qué estrategia habían utilizado en el juego y qué emociones experimentaron. Estos textos fueron analizados con el diccionario construido en el Estudio 1. Se evidenció que la prosocialidad estimada con el diccionario se relacionó positivamente con el comportamiento cooperativo en el juego. Se encontró que el estilo cognitivo tipo II predice el comportamiento prosocial en el juego. Los dos estudios muestran la utilidad del diccionario para evaluar la prosocialidad a través del análisis lingüístico y la posibilidad de ser usado para estimar este constructo en diferentes escenarios.A presença de grandes bases de dados textuais permite a análise automatizada de construtos psicológicos. Para isso, foram desenvolvidos programas que categorizam palavras e identificam, entre outros, estilos cognitivos, linguísticos ou conteúdo emocional. Este trabalho é composto por dois estudos que apresentam evidências de validade de conteúdo e de validade externa de um dicionário destinado a avaliar a pró-socialidade, compatível com o software LIWC. O Estudo 1 partiu de um corpus de termos extraídos de fontes naturais e especializadas, avaliados por sete juízes, resultando em uma lista definitiva. No Estudo 2, utilizou-se um jogo de bens públicos no qual 160 participantes enfrentaram um dilema entre interesse próprio e bem-estar coletivo. Adicionalmente, os participantes responderam por escrito qual estratégia haviam utilizado no jogo e quais emoções experimentaram. Essas respostas foram analisadas com o dicionário construído no Estudo 1. Evidenciou-se que a pró-socialidade, medida pelo dicionário, relacionou-se positivamente com o comportamento cooperativo no jogo. Verificou-se também que o estilo cognitivo tipo II prediz o comportamento pró-social no jogo. Os dois estudos mostram a utilidade do dicionário para avaliar a pró-socialidade por meio da análise linguística e a possibilidade de ser usado para estimar esse construto em diferentes contextos.Universidad Católica del Uruguay2025-09-162025-12-22T16:34:58Z2025-12-22T16:34:58Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/435610.22235/cp.v19i2.4356https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-4356Ciencias Psicológicas; 2025, Volumen 19(2); e-43561688-422110.22235/cp.v19i2reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayspaenghttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3906https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3907https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356/3908Derechos de autor 2025 Ciencias Psicológicashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/56962026-06-16T06:51:28Z
spellingShingle Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
Rojas Landinez, Leidy Johanna
public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
LIWC
cooperación
jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
LIWC
cooperação
status_str publishedVersion
title Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_full Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_fullStr Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_full_unstemmed Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_short Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
title_sort Development, validation, and experimental evidence of a prosociality dictionary
topic public goods game
language analysis
LIWC
cooperation
juego de bienes públicos
análisis lingüístico
LIWC
cooperación
jogo de bens públicos
análise linguística
LIWC
cooperação
url https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/4356
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/5696