Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review.
To identify the existing OHRQoL instruments for adults, describe their scope (generic or specific), theoretical background, validation type, and cross-cultural adaptation. Methods: A systematic search was conducted and articles presenting validation of OHRQoL instruments in adults were included. Dat...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/34297 |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1868890188421267456 |
|---|---|
| author | Riva, Federico |
| author2 | Seoane Campomar, Mariana Reichenheim, Michael Eduardo Tsakos, Georgios Celeste, Roger Keller |
| author2_role | author author author author |
| author_browse | Celeste, Roger Keller Reichenheim, Michael Eduardo Riva, Federico Seoane Campomar, Mariana Tsakos, Georgios |
| author_facet | Riva, Federico Seoane Campomar, Mariana Reichenheim, Michael Eduardo Tsakos, Georgios Celeste, Roger Keller |
| author_role | author |
| collection | COLIBRI |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv | Riva Federico, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay Seoane Campomar Mariana, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay Reichenheim Michael Eduardo, Institute of Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Tsakos Georgios, Department of Epidemiology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Celeste Roger Keller, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Riva, Federico Seoane Campomar, Mariana Reichenheim, Michael Eduardo Tsakos, Georgios Celeste, Roger Keller |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-10-24T17:11:45Z 2022-10-24T17:11:45Z 2022 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | Riva, F, Seoane Campomar, M, Reichenheim, M. y otros "Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review"Community Dent Oral Epidemiol . 2022 Oct;50(5):333-338 [en línea] 2022 doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12689. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/34297 10.1111/cdoe.12689 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | Community Dent Oral Epidemiol . 2022 Oct;50(5):333-338 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial (CC - By-NC 4.0) |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | reponame:COLIBRI instname:Universidad de la República instacron:Universidad de la República |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Factor Analysis Validity Patient- Reported Outcome Measures. PSICOMETRIA SALUD BUCAL ENCUESTA Y CUESTIONARIOS CALIDAD DE VIDA INDICADORES DE SALUD |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | To identify the existing OHRQoL instruments for adults, describe their scope (generic or specific), theoretical background, validation type, and cross-cultural adaptation. Methods: A systematic search was conducted and articles presenting validation of OHRQoL instruments in adults were included. Data were collected about the validation type: external validation (correlations/associations); or internal validation (Factor Analysis/Principal Components Analysis, Item Response Theory); and cross-cultural adaptation. Results: Of 3730 references identified, 326 were included reporting 392 studies. Forty-two original instruments were found among 74 different versions, 40 generic and 34 condition-specific. Locker’s theoretical framework was the predominant model. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) presented 20 versions, with OHIP-14 being the most frequent (26.8%), followed by Geriatric Oral Assessment Index (GOHAI) (14.0%), OHIP-49 (11.7%) and Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) (9.7%). Most studies focused on external validation (65.3%), while internal validation was reported in 24.8% (n=26) of OHIP-14 studies, 50.9% (n=28) of GOHAI, and 21.1% (n=8) of OIDP studies. Most internal validation studies were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=33), and cross-cultural adaptation mostly in non- English-speaking European countries (n=40). Conclusions: Many generic and condition-specific instruments were found, but few have gone through a rigorous internal validation process or have undergone cross-cultural adaptation. This, in turn, makes it difficult for researchers to choose an appropriate measure based on known psychometric properties. OHIP-14, OIDP and GOHAI seem to be the most widely validated instruments. Equalising measurement properties for comparability is challenging due to theoretical heterogeneity. Future studies should assess psychometric properties, explore the factorial structure, and work towards a consensus on critical issues. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | anni_c60a294b9d02e82c3ca18ae9e8d7f18f |
| identifier_str_mv | Riva, F, Seoane Campomar, M, Reichenheim, M. y otros "Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review"Community Dent Oral Epidemiol . 2022 Oct;50(5):333-338 [en línea] 2022 doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12689. 10.1111/cdoe.12689 |
| instacron_str | Universidad de la República |
| institution | Universidad de la República |
| instname_str | Universidad de la República |
| language | eng |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | anni |
| network_name_str | oai-lr-anni |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:colibri.udelar.edu.uy:20.500.12008/34297 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| reponame_str | COLIBRI |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial (CC - By-NC 4.0) |
| spelling | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review.Riva, FedericoSeoane Campomar, MarianaReichenheim, Michael EduardoTsakos, GeorgiosCeleste, Roger KellerOral Health-Related Quality of LifeFactor AnalysisValidityPatient- Reported Outcome Measures.PSICOMETRIASALUD BUCALENCUESTA Y CUESTIONARIOSCALIDAD DE VIDAINDICADORES DE SALUDTo identify the existing OHRQoL instruments for adults, describe their scope (generic or specific), theoretical background, validation type, and cross-cultural adaptation. Methods: A systematic search was conducted and articles presenting validation of OHRQoL instruments in adults were included. Data were collected about the validation type: external validation (correlations/associations); or internal validation (Factor Analysis/Principal Components Analysis, Item Response Theory); and cross-cultural adaptation. Results: Of 3730 references identified, 326 were included reporting 392 studies. Forty-two original instruments were found among 74 different versions, 40 generic and 34 condition-specific. Locker’s theoretical framework was the predominant model. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) presented 20 versions, with OHIP-14 being the most frequent (26.8%), followed by Geriatric Oral Assessment Index (GOHAI) (14.0%), OHIP-49 (11.7%) and Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) (9.7%). Most studies focused on external validation (65.3%), while internal validation was reported in 24.8% (n=26) of OHIP-14 studies, 50.9% (n=28) of GOHAI, and 21.1% (n=8) of OIDP studies. Most internal validation studies were conducted in English-speaking countries (n=33), and cross-cultural adaptation mostly in non- English-speaking European countries (n=40). Conclusions: Many generic and condition-specific instruments were found, but few have gone through a rigorous internal validation process or have undergone cross-cultural adaptation. This, in turn, makes it difficult for researchers to choose an appropriate measure based on known psychometric properties. OHIP-14, OIDP and GOHAI seem to be the most widely validated instruments. Equalising measurement properties for comparability is challenging due to theoretical heterogeneity. Future studies should assess psychometric properties, explore the factorial structure, and work towards a consensus on critical issues.Riva Federico, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Republic, Montevideo, UruguaySeoane Campomar Mariana, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Republic, Montevideo, UruguayReichenheim Michael Eduardo, Institute of Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilTsakos Georgios, Department of Epidemiology, University College London, London, United KingdomCeleste Roger Keller, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.2022-10-24T17:11:45Z2022-10-24T17:11:45Z2022Artículoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfRiva, F, Seoane Campomar, M, Reichenheim, M. y otros "Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review"Community Dent Oral Epidemiol . 2022 Oct;50(5):333-338 [en línea] 2022 doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12689.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/3429710.1111/cdoe.12689reponame:COLIBRIinstname:Universidad de la Repúblicainstacron:Universidad de la RepúblicaenengCommunity Dent Oral Epidemiol . 2022 Oct;50(5):333-338Las obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLicencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial (CC - By-NC 4.0)oai:colibri.udelar.edu.uy:20.500.12008/342972026-04-14T10:37:13Z |
| spellingShingle | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. Riva, Federico Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Factor Analysis Validity Patient- Reported Outcome Measures. PSICOMETRIA SALUD BUCAL ENCUESTA Y CUESTIONARIOS CALIDAD DE VIDA INDICADORES DE SALUD |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| title_full | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| title_fullStr | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| title_short | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| title_sort | Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review. |
| topic | Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Factor Analysis Validity Patient- Reported Outcome Measures. PSICOMETRIA SALUD BUCAL ENCUESTA Y CUESTIONARIOS CALIDAD DE VIDA INDICADORES DE SALUD |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/34297 |