Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study

This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Implants and the Biocompatibility of Biodegradable Biomaterials

I tiakina i:
Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
Kaituhi matua: Gehrke, S.A. (author)
Ētahi atu kaituhi: Prados-Frutos, J.C. (author), Prados-Privado, M. (author), Calvo-Guirado, J.L. (author), Aramburú Júnior, J. (author), Pérez-Díaz, Leticia (author), Mazón, P. (author), Aragoneses, J.M. (author), De Aza, P.N. (author)
Hōputu: article
Reo:Ingarihi
I whakaputaina: 2019
Ngā marau:
Urunga tuihono:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/30075
Ngā Tūtohu: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
_version_ 1868890174517149696
author Gehrke, S.A.
author2 Prados-Frutos, J.C.
Prados-Privado, M.
Calvo-Guirado, J.L.
Aramburú Júnior, J.
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Mazón, P.
Aragoneses, J.M.
De Aza, P.N.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_browse Aragoneses, J.M.
Aramburú Júnior, J.
Calvo-Guirado, J.L.
De Aza, P.N.
Gehrke, S.A.
Mazón, P.
Prados-Frutos, J.C.
Prados-Privado, M.
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
author_facet Gehrke, S.A.
Prados-Frutos, J.C.
Prados-Privado, M.
Calvo-Guirado, J.L.
Aramburú Júnior, J.
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Mazón, P.
Aragoneses, J.M.
De Aza, P.N.
author_role author
collection COLIBRI
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Gehrke S.A.
Prados-Frutos J.C.
Prados-Privado M.
Calvo-Guirado J.L.
Aramburú Júnior J.
Pérez-Díaz Leticia, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Química Biológica.
Mazón P.
Aragoneses J.M.
De Aza P.N.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gehrke, S.A.
Prados-Frutos, J.C.
Prados-Privado, M.
Calvo-Guirado, J.L.
Aramburú Júnior, J.
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Mazón, P.
Aragoneses, J.M.
De Aza, P.N.
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2021-11-08T14:52:38Z
2021-11-08T14:52:38Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 13 h.
application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv Gehrke, S, Prados-Frutos, J, Prados-Privado, M, [y otros] "Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study". Materials. [en línea] 2019, 12(6): 856. 13 h. DOI: 10.3390/ma12060856
1996-1944
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/30075
10.3390/ma12060856
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Materials, 2019, 12(6): 856
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:COLIBRI
instname:Universidad de la República
instacron:Universidad de la República
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Osseointegration
Bone healing
Bone quality
Zirconia implants
Titanium implants
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Implants and the Biocompatibility of Biodegradable Biomaterials
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id anni_b7d7c5bbbeebd593fee266fd7e6cdada
identifier_str_mv Gehrke, S, Prados-Frutos, J, Prados-Privado, M, [y otros] "Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study". Materials. [en línea] 2019, 12(6): 856. 13 h. DOI: 10.3390/ma12060856
1996-1944
10.3390/ma12060856
instacron_str Universidad de la República
institution Universidad de la República
instname_str Universidad de la República
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str anni
network_name_str oai-lr-anni
oai_identifier_str oai:colibri.udelar.edu.uy:20.500.12008/30075
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
reponame_str COLIBRI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
spelling Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal studyGehrke, S.A.Prados-Frutos, J.C.Prados-Privado, M.Calvo-Guirado, J.L.Aramburú Júnior, J.Pérez-Díaz, LeticiaMazón, P.Aragoneses, J.M.De Aza, P.N.OsseointegrationBone healingBone qualityZirconia implantsTitanium implantsThis article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Implants and the Biocompatibility of Biodegradable BiomaterialsObjectives: The aim of this study was to perform an in vivo histological comparative evaluation of bone formation around titanium (machined and treated surface) and zirconia implants. For the present study were used 50 commercially pure titanium implants grade IV, being that 25 implants with a machined surface (TiM group), 25 implants with a treated surface (TiT group) and, 25 implants were manufactured in pure zirconia (Zr group). The implants (n = 20 per group) were installed in the tibia of 10 rabbits. The implants distribution was randomized (n = 3 implants per tibia). Five implants of each group were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and an optical laser profilometer for surface roughness characterization. Six weeks after the implantation, 10 implants for each group were removed in counter-torque for analysis of maximum torque value. The remaining samples were processed, included in historesin and cut to obtain non-decalcified slides for histomorphological analyses and histomorphometric measurement of the percentage of bone-implant contact (BIC%). Comparisons were made between the groups using a 5% level of significance (p < 0.05) to assess statistical differences. The results of removal torque values (mean ± standard deviation) showed for the TiM group 15.9 ± 4.18 N cm, for TiT group 27.9 ± 5.15 N cm and for Zr group 11.5 ± 2.92 N cm, with significant statistical difference between the groups (p < 0.0001). However, the BIC% presented similar values for all groups (35.4 ± 4.54 for TiM group, 37.8 ± 4.84 for TiT group and 34.0 ± 6.82 for Zr group), with no statistical differences (p = 0.2171). Within the limitations of the present study, the findings suggest that the quality of the new bone tissue formed around the titanium implants present a superior density (maturation) in comparison to the zirconia implants.MDPIGehrke S.A.Prados-Frutos J.C.Prados-Privado M.Calvo-Guirado J.L.Aramburú Júnior J.Pérez-Díaz Leticia, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Química Biológica.Mazón P.Aragoneses J.M.De Aza P.N.2021-11-08T14:52:38Z2021-11-08T14:52:38Z2019Artículoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion13 h.application/pdfGehrke, S, Prados-Frutos, J, Prados-Privado, M, [y otros] "Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study". Materials. [en línea] 2019, 12(6): 856. 13 h. DOI: 10.3390/ma120608561996-1944https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/3007510.3390/ma12060856reponame:COLIBRIinstname:Universidad de la Repúblicainstacron:Universidad de la RepúblicaenengMaterials, 2019, 12(6): 856Las obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLicencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)oai:colibri.udelar.edu.uy:20.500.12008/300752026-04-14T10:09:42Z
spellingShingle Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
Gehrke, S.A.
Osseointegration
Bone healing
Bone quality
Zirconia implants
Titanium implants
status_str publishedVersion
title Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
title_full Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
title_fullStr Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
title_short Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
title_sort Biomechanical and histological analysis of titanium (machined and treated surface) versus zirconia implant materials: an in vivo animal study
topic Osseointegration
Bone healing
Bone quality
Zirconia implants
Titanium implants
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/30075