National Margin of Appreciation. The Apparent Conflict with Conventionality Control
This work aims to reconcile the apparent contradiction between the doctrine of the national margin of appreciation and the increasing impact of pronouncements by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights through the construction of the notions of “margin of appreciation within the conventionality con...
Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | article |
| Dil: | İspanyolca |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
2023
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/3114 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7311 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
| Özet: | This work aims to reconcile the apparent contradiction between the doctrine of the national margin of appreciation and the increasing impact of pronouncements by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights through the construction of the notions of “margin of appreciation within the conventionality control” and “margin of appreciation post-sanction”. Both clearly differentiated moments delineate spaces of discretion and respective controls between the States and the Inter-American Court. To give content to these notions, the characteristics of the Inter-American human rights protection system and its expansive process in recent decades will be analyzed. The concept of the national margin of appreciation will be examined in a comparative perspective, considering both the doctrine and jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, highlighting their similarities and differences. Finally, reflection will be made on the two proposed notions in which a margin of appreciation in favor of the States could be enabled. |
|---|