Our experience with choledochoscopy
The authors make a retrospective analysis of 198cases of biliar lithiasis surgery 11 O cases had notundergone choledoscopy (group 1) and 88 caseshad (group 2). They detail the most importanttechnical steps, global and specific morbimortalityThe latter is higher far group 1. A remarkabledecrease of r...
Tallennettuna:
| Päätekijä: | |
|---|---|
| Muut tekijät: | , , , , , , , |
| Aineistotyyppi: | article |
| Kieli: | espanja |
| Julkaistu: |
1996
|
| Aiheet: | |
| Linkit: | https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4262 |
| Tagit: |
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
|
| Yhteenveto: | The authors make a retrospective analysis of 198cases of biliar lithiasis surgery 11 O cases had notundergone choledoscopy (group 1) and 88 caseshad (group 2). They detail the most importanttechnical steps, global and specific morbimortalityThe latter is higher far group 1. A remarkabledecrease of residual lithiasis is pointed out fargroup 2.Conclusions: choledoscopy is an effective methofar decreasing complications in the biliar tree.Choledoscopy is not a substitute farcholangiography and its good results need alearning. |
|---|