Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.

ABSTRACT.- In this article we make comments on some methodological issues and on the general approach of the paper "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" by Ina Säumel, Leonardo R. Ramírez, Sarah Tietjen, Marcos Barra, a...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autor: PARUELO, J. (author)
Další autoři: LÓPEZ MARSICO, L. (author), BALDASSINI, P. (author), LEZAMA, F. (author), BAZZONI, B. (author), STAIANO, L. (author), NÚÑEZ, A. (author), GUIDO, A. (author), RÍOS, C. (author), TOMMASINO, A. (author), GALLEGO, F. (author), PEZZANI, F. (author), CAMBA SANS, G. (author), QUINCKE, A. (author), BAEZA, S. (author), PIÑEIRO, G. (author), BAETHGEN, W. (author)
Médium: article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2023
Témata:
On-line přístup:https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64682&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64682&qFacets=64682
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
_version_ 1868890094109196288
author PARUELO, J.
author2 LÓPEZ MARSICO, L.
BALDASSINI, P.
LEZAMA, F.
BAZZONI, B.
STAIANO, L.
NÚÑEZ, A.
GUIDO, A.
RÍOS, C.
TOMMASINO, A.
GALLEGO, F.
PEZZANI, F.
CAMBA SANS, G.
QUINCKE, A.
BAEZA, S.
PIÑEIRO, G.
BAETHGEN, W.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_browse BAETHGEN, W.
BAEZA, S.
BALDASSINI, P.
BAZZONI, B.
CAMBA SANS, G.
GALLEGO, F.
GUIDO, A.
LEZAMA, F.
LÓPEZ MARSICO, L.
NÚÑEZ, A.
PARUELO, J.
PEZZANI, F.
PIÑEIRO, G.
QUINCKE, A.
RÍOS, C.
STAIANO, L.
TOMMASINO, A.
author_facet PARUELO, J.
LÓPEZ MARSICO, L.
BALDASSINI, P.
LEZAMA, F.
BAZZONI, B.
STAIANO, L.
NÚÑEZ, A.
GUIDO, A.
RÍOS, C.
TOMMASINO, A.
GALLEGO, F.
PEZZANI, F.
CAMBA SANS, G.
QUINCKE, A.
BAEZA, S.
PIÑEIRO, G.
BAETHGEN, W.
author_role author
collection AINFO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv PARUELO, J.
LÓPEZ MARSICO, L.
BALDASSINI, P.
LEZAMA, F.
BAZZONI, B.
STAIANO, L.
NÚÑEZ, A.
GUIDO, A.
RÍOS, C.
TOMMASINO, A.
GALLEGO, F.
PEZZANI, F.
CAMBA SANS, G.
QUINCKE, A.
BAEZA, S.
PIÑEIRO, G.
BAETHGEN, W.
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2025-06-23T18:41:06Z
2025-06-23T18:41:06Z
2025-06-23T18:41:06Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64682&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64682&qFacets=64682
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Acceso abierto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:AINFO
instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Grassland management
Soil health
Landscapes
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
PublishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description ABSTRACT.- In this article we make comments on some methodological issues and on the general approach of the paper "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" by Ina Säumel, Leonardo R. Ramírez, Sarah Tietjen, Marcos Barra, and Erick Zagal, Soil 9, 425-442, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-425-2023. We identified various design and methodological problems that may induce potential misinterpretations. Our concerns are of three different types. First, there are aspects of the study design and methodology that, in our opinion, introduce biases and critical errors. Secondly, the article does not put forth any novel propositions and ignores extensive local literature and aspects that are central to the interpretation of the data Finally, we are concerned about the possible interpretations of a study, generated from institutions based on developed countries with not the participation of local scientists from the Global South in the design of policies and development of non-tariff barriers for South American countries. @ Author(s) 2023
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id anni_715ecdd03d626bf6fc537c4c6cf60e8d
instacron_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
institution Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str anni
network_name_str oai-lr-anni
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4781
publishDate 2023
publishDateSort 2023
reponame_str AINFO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
spelling Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.PARUELO, J.LÓPEZ MARSICO, L.BALDASSINI, P.LEZAMA, F.BAZZONI, B.STAIANO, L.NÚÑEZ, A.GUIDO, A.RÍOS, C.TOMMASINO, A.GALLEGO, F.PEZZANI, F.CAMBA SANS, G.QUINCKE, A.BAEZA, S.PIÑEIRO, G.BAETHGEN, W.Grassland managementSoil healthLandscapesABSTRACT.- In this article we make comments on some methodological issues and on the general approach of the paper "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" by Ina Säumel, Leonardo R. Ramírez, Sarah Tietjen, Marcos Barra, and Erick Zagal, Soil 9, 425-442, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-425-2023. We identified various design and methodological problems that may induce potential misinterpretations. Our concerns are of three different types. First, there are aspects of the study design and methodology that, in our opinion, introduce biases and critical errors. Secondly, the article does not put forth any novel propositions and ignores extensive local literature and aspects that are central to the interpretation of the data Finally, we are concerned about the possible interpretations of a study, generated from institutions based on developed countries with not the participation of local scientists from the Global South in the design of policies and development of non-tariff barriers for South American countries. @ Author(s) 20232025-06-23T18:41:06Z2025-06-23T18:41:06Z20232025-06-23T18:41:06ZArticlePublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64682&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64682&qFacets=64682reponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariaenenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertooai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/47812026-02-10T17:36:10Z
spellingShingle Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
PARUELO, J.
Grassland management
Soil health
Landscapes
status_str publishedVersion
title Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
title_full Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
title_fullStr Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
title_full_unstemmed Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
title_short Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
title_sort Comment on: "Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay" On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence.
topic Grassland management
Soil health
Landscapes
url https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64682&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64682&qFacets=64682