Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity

This article is created due to the necessary analysis of law dispositions that recognize fundamental rights and can be verified both in situations of complementarity and collision.In this scenario, the article intends to advance in the consideration of the different analysis that have to be done due...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nahabetián Brunet, Laura (author)
Format: article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1237
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7185
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868890093087883264
author Nahabetián Brunet, Laura
author_browse Nahabetián Brunet, Laura
author_facet Nahabetián Brunet, Laura
author_role author
collection LIBERI
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Nahabetián Brunet, Laura
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-05
2025-12-22T16:47:32Z
2025-12-22T16:47:32Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1237
10.22235/rd.v0i14.1237
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7185
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1237/1329
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; No. 14 (2016): Revista de Derecho; 65- 110
Revista de Derecho; Núm. 14 (2016): Revista de Derecho; 65- 110
Revista de Derecho; N.º 14 (2016): Revista de Derecho; 65- 110
2393-6193
1510-3714
10.22235/rd.v0i14
reponame:LIBERI
instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv derechos humanos
eficacia
límites
contenido esencial
principios.
human rights
efficacy
limits
essential content
principles.
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
Normas de derechos humanos: Colisión y complementariedad
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Papers evaluated by peers
Artículos evaluados por pares
Avaliados por pares
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description This article is created due to the necessary analysis of law dispositions that recognize fundamental rights and can be verified both in situations of complementarity and collision.In this scenario, the article intends to advance in the consideration of the different analysis that have to be done due to the constant existence of regulation antinomies, considering a special emphasis in the structure of regulations that refer to human rights, the meaning of their limitation and their essential content.Furthermore, an analysis of some considerations related to principles that have to appear as sustentation of the decisions related to this matter is presented.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id anni_6ff757c0b7bbfb347a198ec6d75ba71c
identifier_str_mv 10.22235/rd.v0i14.1237
instacron_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
institution Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instname_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
language spa
network_acronym_str anni
network_name_str oai-lr-anni
oai_identifier_str oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7185
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
reponame_str LIBERI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho
spelling Human rights standards: Collision and complementarityNormas de derechos humanos: Colisión y complementariedadNahabetián Brunet, Lauraderechos humanoseficacialímitescontenido esencialprincipios.human rightsefficacylimitsessential contentprinciples.This article is created due to the necessary analysis of law dispositions that recognize fundamental rights and can be verified both in situations of complementarity and collision.In this scenario, the article intends to advance in the consideration of the different analysis that have to be done due to the constant existence of regulation antinomies, considering a special emphasis in the structure of regulations that refer to human rights, the meaning of their limitation and their essential content.Furthermore, an analysis of some considerations related to principles that have to appear as sustentation of the decisions related to this matter is presented.El artículo refiere al análisis de necesaria realización frente a la existencia de disposiciones normativas que reconociendo derechos fundamentales, pudieren verificarse en situación de complementariedad y eventualmente en aquella de colisión.De esta forma se pretende avanzar sobre la consideración de los diferentes análisis que deben realizarse a partir de la existencia de las siempre presentes, antinomias normativas, considerando con especial énfasis la estructura de las normas continentes de derechos humanos, el significado de su limitación y su contenido esencial.Asimismo, se analizan algunas consideraciones relacionadas con los principios que deben estar presentes en tanto sustento de las decisiones en la materia.Universidad Católica del Uruguay2016-12-052025-12-22T16:47:32Z2025-12-22T16:47:32Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/123710.22235/rd.v0i14.1237https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7185Revista de Derecho; No. 14 (2016): Revista de Derecho; 65- 110Revista de Derecho; Núm. 14 (2016): Revista de Derecho; 65- 110Revista de Derecho; N.º 14 (2016): Revista de Derecho; 65- 1102393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i14reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayspahttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1237/1329Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/71852026-06-16T06:54:03Z
spellingShingle Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
Nahabetián Brunet, Laura
derechos humanos
eficacia
límites
contenido esencial
principios.
human rights
efficacy
limits
essential content
principles.
status_str publishedVersion
title Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
title_full Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
title_fullStr Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
title_full_unstemmed Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
title_short Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
title_sort Human rights standards: Collision and complementarity
topic derechos humanos
eficacia
límites
contenido esencial
principios.
human rights
efficacy
limits
essential content
principles.
url https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1237
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7185