Legal Neo rhetoric.

Abstract:The present paper provides a categorization and hierarchy of the various stylistic stages in which rhetoric has been presented in time, to effect of contrasting with the concept proposed in the article in a new way to understand and build the discourse in a judicial dispute, based on the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ribeiro, Gerardo (author)
Format: article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/740
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868890056995897344
author Ribeiro, Gerardo
author_browse Ribeiro, Gerardo
author_facet Ribeiro, Gerardo
author_role author
collection LIBERI
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Gerardo
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-22
2025-12-22T16:47:20Z
2025-12-22T16:47:20Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/740
10.22235/rd.v0i10.740
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7081
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/740/730
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; No. 10 (2014): Revista de Derecho; 181-196
Revista de Derecho; Núm. 10 (2014): Revista de Derecho; 181-196
Revista de Derecho; N.º 10 (2014): Revista de Derecho; 181-196
2393-6193
1510-3714
10.22235/rd.v0i10
reponame:LIBERI
instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv retórica
argumentación
ley
juicio
rhetoric
argumentation
law
trial
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal Neo rhetoric.
Neo retórica jurídica.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Papers evaluated by peers
Artículos evaluados por pares
Avaliados por pares
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description Abstract:The present paper provides a categorization and hierarchy of the various stylistic stages in which rhetoric has been presented in time, to effect of contrasting with the concept proposed in the article in a new way to understand and build the discourse in a judicial dispute, based on the concept of “rationality” understood as argumentative discourse. To this new way of conceiving the legal rationality, the author calls it “Neo rhetoric”.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id anni_53f4b2591c5bbc8e3740eef0fd27862e
identifier_str_mv 10.22235/rd.v0i10.740
instacron_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
institution Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instname_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
language spa
network_acronym_str anni
network_name_str oai-lr-anni
oai_identifier_str oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7081
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
reponame_str LIBERI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho
spelling Legal Neo rhetoric.Neo retórica jurídica.Ribeiro, GerardoretóricaargumentaciónleyjuiciorhetoricargumentationlawtrialAbstract:The present paper provides a categorization and hierarchy of the various stylistic stages in which rhetoric has been presented in time, to effect of contrasting with the concept proposed in the article in a new way to understand and build the discourse in a judicial dispute, based on the concept of “rationality” understood as argumentative discourse. To this new way of conceiving the legal rationality, the author calls it “Neo rhetoric”.Resumen: El presente trabajo ofrece una categorización y jerarquización de las diversas etapas estilísticas en las que se ha presentado la retórica en el tiempo, a efecto de contrastar con la concepción que se propone en el artículo de un nuevo modo de entender y de construir el discurso en la disputa judicial, a partir del concepto de “racionalidad”entendido como discurso argumentativo. A este nuevo modo de concebir la racionalidad jurídica, el autor lo denomina “Neo retórica”.Universidad Católica del Uruguay2016-01-222025-12-22T16:47:20Z2025-12-22T16:47:20Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/74010.22235/rd.v0i10.740https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7081Revista de Derecho; No. 10 (2014): Revista de Derecho; 181-196Revista de Derecho; Núm. 10 (2014): Revista de Derecho; 181-196Revista de Derecho; N.º 10 (2014): Revista de Derecho; 181-1962393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i10reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayspahttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/740/730Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/70812026-06-16T06:53:48Z
spellingShingle Legal Neo rhetoric.
Ribeiro, Gerardo
retórica
argumentación
ley
juicio
rhetoric
argumentation
law
trial
status_str publishedVersion
title Legal Neo rhetoric.
title_full Legal Neo rhetoric.
title_fullStr Legal Neo rhetoric.
title_full_unstemmed Legal Neo rhetoric.
title_short Legal Neo rhetoric.
title_sort Legal Neo rhetoric.
topic retórica
argumentación
ley
juicio
rhetoric
argumentation
law
trial
url https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/740
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7081