Commentary on the ruling on eutanasia. Action for protection of constitutional rights by Ana Estrada Ugarte, against the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Justice, and the Peruvian Social Health Insurance. Supreme Court of Justice of Lima, 11th Constitu
A critical analysis is made of the ruling that accepts the action for protection of constitutional rights of Ana Estrada declaring inapplicable, as unconstitutional, the article of the Criminal Code that criminalizes mercy killing (which prohibits euthanasia). The supposed “right to euthanasia” is c...
Збережено в:
| Автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | article |
| Мова: | Іспанська |
| Опубліковано: |
2021
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/806 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1764 |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Схожі ресурси: Commentary on the ruling on eutanasia. Action for protection of constitutional rights by Ana Estrada Ugarte, against the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Justice, and the Peruvian Social Health Insurance. Supreme Court of Justice of Lima, 11th Constitu
- Towards redignifying the Uruguayan prison system: critical perspectives in light of the concept of human dignity
- Disposiciones y estipulaciones del plenamente capaz para regir en caso de la propia y eventual incapacidad
- The protection of widowed women's dignity in Spanish society
- El discurso de la corte interamericana de derechos humanos sobre dignidad de personas privadas de libertad: fuentes, fórmulas usuales y citas
- The protection of animals by Law: Do animals have rights?
- Sobre los derechos en la constitución uruguaya. Una propuesta de revisión conceptual